Sunday, January 6, 2013

El Presidente

January 6, 2012



Being a history buff, I really made time to watch "El Presidente," an entry in the 2012 Metro Manila Film Fest about the President of the First Philippine Republic, Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo. It is about time that that era in Philippine History was given a definitive movie rendition. I had high hopes about this film, since producer Laguna Gov. Jeorge "E.R." Ejercito (as Jeorge ER Estregan) gave us a very well-made biopic of gangster Asiong Salonga in last year's MMFF. It had not been easy to find time to watch since this epic film had a formidable running time of two hours and thirty minutes.

Because of a very slow line at the ticket counter, it was so annoying that I got a seat already 10 or so minutes into film. Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo (Estregan) and his generals were about to launch an attack to take over the town of Cavite Viejo. From there, it follows the life of Aguinaldo, from the events leading up to the declaration of Philippine Independence on June 12, 1898, to his capture in Palanan by the Americans, up to his death at the age of 94 in the year 1964. The battle scenes were very well shot with a huge cast of real extras playing the soldiers of all nationalities. There were some impressive close-up stop-motion special effects during the fight scenes, as we saw in films like "300" or "Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter".

The film did not shirk to tackle very controversial historical issues about Aguinaldo's role in the deaths of Andres Bonifacio and Antonio Luna. They did not hide the fact that all this was based on the memoirs of El Presidente himself, hence the probable bias in point of view. Now, what truly happened is still the bone of historical contentions. Bonifacio in particular was presented in a very negative light here. Montano's acting highlight as Bonifacio for me was his pained reaction to losing the vote for president at the Tejeros Assemby to his breakdown when someone protested his win as Secretary of the Interior. This scene alone was worth his Best Supporting Actor award. Too bad I did not get to watch the recent film biography of Andres Bonifacio entitled "Supremo" to see and compare its version of these same events. Antonio Luna was played by Christopher de Leon in his typical acting style. The script basically concentrated on his nasty temperament, not on his military prowess. But then again this was not a film about Gen. Luna anyway.

So, how was Estregan as Aguinaldo? Unfortunately, as with the problem of Estregan as Asiong Salonga the year before, he tends to be very melodramatic in his acting style. He indicates almost everything he says with some awkward gestures. There was a scene when Aguinaldo was exiled where Estregan silently pours out his emotions in unrealistically exaggerated bawling, accompanied by swelling dramatic music. If this was his attempt to add points to his quest to be best actor, someone should advise him that less is more when it comes to acting nowadays. It is also remarkable that every time the camera focuses on his face, he has skin so flawless that it radiates like a halo. That was some impressive special effect right there.

The huge name supporting cast was a veritable who's who of Filipino character actors. It was actually fun to try and identify all of them when they appear on screen playing all the revolutionary heroes we can think of and more. It can be amusing to see them in very fake- looking stiff hair and make-up though. There was everyone from the expected likes of Ronnie Lazaro, Sid Lucero, Allan Paule, John Regala, Joko Diaz, John Arcilla and Yul Servo, to the unexpected likes of Epi Quizon, Ian de Leon, Dennis Padilla, Will Devaughn and Bayani Agbayani. Baron Geisler is really quite stereotyped as an antagonist, and he really delivers the goods as a smirking Spanish officer, despite the puny mustache they made him wear. He was quite good in sword fights too. The only realistic Spaniard in my opinion was Ian Veneracion who did not need to don fake facial hair. Emilio Garcia, Gary Estrada and Wendell Ramos could have been realistic Spaniards but instead they play Filipinos.

There were only two female supporting roles. The first wife Hilaria, played by Cristine Reyes, was practically a silent role where all she had to do was look pretty, and die later without aging despite after having four kids. Much ado had been made about Ms. Nora Aunor playing Maria, his second wife. Unfortunately, this was such a bad case of miscasting. She looked ill at ease from her first scene as a shy young (?!) lady to her last scene as she lay in bed with Estregan as senior citizens. This last scene was woefully shot in such an ugly angle for Aunor that she looked unrecognizably bad. Too bad as that was an important scene about Aguinaldo's joy upon Macapagal's transfer of Independence Day celebrations from July 4 back to June 12. Oh yes, Sunshine Cruz also had a cameo as Gregoria de Jesus, and you can imagine that it was unrealistic.

Overall though, despite all the imperfections, I still think this was a very earnest film made with the very best of intentions, and obviously produced with generosity of budget. I commend Gov. E.R. Ejercito for taking on this huge project, as this is a story that needed to be told. Students nowadays can use this film to gain interest with the history of the Philippine Revolution as this movie brings all those historical characters to life, from Apolinario Mabini to Gregorio del Pilar. It is up to their teachers to guide them in those contentious issues, especially the events involving the iconic revered hero, Andres Bonifacio. This is a movie that will serve its purpose when it is watched critically and discussed afterwards.

9 comments:

  1. The Bonifacio vs Aguinaldo part is really a contentious in Philippine History. It helps that the film has top rated actors playing and it would be interesting to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the film festival ends today and we only watched one entry. I'm not a fan of historical film (I like touring around historical sites more), except the likes of Dan Brown's book-turned-into-movies.

    Local historical films should be taken with a little more seriousness, both in the part of the actors as well as the viewers, so the message can be delivered with credibility and appreciated by both sides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the other hand, historical sites come to life more when you know the history behind these sites, like Corrigidor, Kawit, Barasoain, etc...

      Delete
  3. All I can say is that.. I am still looking for the next Rizal movie(marilou diaz abaya film). Not bad but I'm not impressed. a lot of the scenes are very unrealistic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am really awaiting a powerful Revolution film with most, if not all, the key heroes in it. This one was a good attempt, but too biased in favor of Aguinaldo. Young people who did not care to find out from where this film was based may be disillusioned with the negative way Bonifacio was treated in this film.

      Delete
  4. Im supposed to watch this movie the other day, it caught my attention since it was labeled as the 'MOST awarded movie for 2012 MMFF"

    ReplyDelete
  5. I remember watching Estregan in an old movie shown on TV and the acting was really exaggerated, so I was not surprised with his level of performance here. I was at the Aguinaldo Shrine last week and met one of the El Presidente's distant relative and he has the same observation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I haven't watched the film yet because I'm not a "history" person. But seeing the trailer, mas gusto ko parin ang Rizal played by Cesar M. But I do hope that this film will be featured sa mga schools for additional learning and para mas maappreciate nila history.

    ReplyDelete
  7. watch pinoy tv show here pinoy-fans.org

    or download our android application here pinoy-fans android app

    or download our apple application here pinoy-fans ios app

    LIKE US : Facebook

    ReplyDelete