Saturday, June 4, 2016

Review of A HOLOGRAM FOR A KING: Arid Anecdotes from Arabia

June 2, 2016




Alan Clay was an American salesman who just lost his livelihood, his house and his wife. Desperate to prove his worth and earn big in the process, he grabs a chance to sell the King of Saudi Arabia an advanced holographic teleconferencing system. However, he never expected the endless delays he would encounter there, leading him to various encounter new people and experience their exotic culture first hand.

Having a look inside Saudi Arabia would have been very interesting for us who would probably have no real chance to go visit there. However, a failed depressed salesman was probably not the best tour guide to show us around. Even if that salesman was played by Tom Hanks. The humor was mild at best, and not really sharp. There was really nothing much Hanks could do to lift the tedium out of the dry, anecdotal, ultimately pointless material.

All the time Clay spent waiting for nothing and all the runaround he met with his contacts, these also took their toll on the glacial pace of the storytelling. He also developed a big lump on his back, which probably symbolized the internal pressure he was experiencing. (This lump actually reminded me of the big boil the character of Coco Martin had on his butt in Brillante Mendoza's "Serbis".) In separate episodes, Clay accidentally entered Mecca, told a lame joke about the CIA, saw a wolf in a rifle crosshatch, drove a sleek new Audi -- all of which led absolutely nowhere. 

I liked the chemistry between Hanks and Alexander Black (who played his gregarious driver Yousef) which was vital. Black though seemed more American than Arab. Clay's relationship with his lady Saudi doctor Zahra (Sarita Choudhury) was entirely unbelievable for me the way their story was told. I don't know anymore if all the other supposedly Arabic traits and culture being shown were accurate or not. Aside from Arabs, there were  indirect digs about the permissiveness of Danes and the cutthroat business sense of the Chinese.

This is not the typical Tom Hanks film we expect. Usually, even if it was deadly serious, like "Captain Phillips" or "Bridge of Spies", there is an engaging story to draw us in. In this uneven film, there was nothing to root for. If there was one positive element I could cite,it would be its rich cinematography of the barren Arabian desert and the crystal blue sea water with its rich coral bed. Otherwise, there was nothing really compelling in the story (adapted from the novel by Dave Eggers) to keep us interested or even awake. 

Director Tom Tykwer had previously gained my admiration for films like "Run Lola Run" (1998) and "Perfume" (2006), both stories told with cinematic skill. But this time, the two film veteran Toms (Hanks and Tykwer) have a misfire. 4/10.

P.S. This was rated R-13 locally. I believe there were scenes of a sensitive nature here that should have earned it an R-16 rating. 


13 comments:

  1. I read your review and I liked the plot and setting as well. Likewise, maybe it's in Jeddah or UAE but I'm looking forward watching this film.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did not know that there is this new tom hanks movie. Thanks for the heads up. Give that the rating is not quite good, I might opt to watch the bridge of spies since I have not watched that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I started liking Tom Hanks after Terminal movie. This sounds good too. It so happens that many a times when hollywood movies try to depict a culture unfamiliar to them, they end up generalizing a lot of things. It did happen with Slumdog Millionaire & India!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bhushavali, this is such an interesting comment about Slumdog Millionaire. I wish you could elaborate more about the hasty generalizations done about India in that film.

      Delete
  4. Interesting movie. With Tom Hanks and with the help of you review, I think I will watch this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'll probably sleep through the whole movie, although I can say that the setting / location is interesting. I love Tom Hanks and I'm sure there's something good in the story that made him accept the role.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whoa this must be a disaster to watch. I think it's not a good film for a travel show and it's okay if the best tourist attractions aren't featured. A believable story that will hook the heart of the audience is what counts more. Sorry to hear that the movie failed to deliver in that aspect.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The plot seems complicated and not compelling enough to follow. It's a bit different from regular Tom Hanks movies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now I'm curious to find out why you rated this film 4 out of 10. Does the movie have dull moments more than the Bridges of Spies?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm surprised that a Tom Hanks film would have such a low rating. But you can't deny a bad story line when there's really nothing to show for it. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I'm curious about the film but only because of your review.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tom Hanks means awesome performance guaranteed!The premise of this movie is interesting especially the Saudi theme.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What I love movie reviews is that it really helps you decide should you watch the movie or not. But on the other hand, I consider watching the trailer though. But as for your review, this somehow convinced me not to watch but partly convincing me to give it a try. As the saying goes, don't judge the book by its cover. But sure your review helps a lot. :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hmmm seems to be an ibteresting film. I love tom hanks so this will be on my list

    ReplyDelete